PASSAGE-24
The most avid users
of social-networking websites may be exhibitionist teenagers, but when
it comes to more grown-up use by business people, such sites have a
surprisingly long pedigree. LinkedIn, an online network for
professionals that signed up its ten-millionth user this week, was
launched in 2003, a few months before MySpace, the biggest of the social
sites. Consumer adoption of social networking has grabbed most
attention since then. But interest in the business uses of the
technology is rising. Many companies are attracted by the marketing
opportunities offered by community sites. But the results can be
painful. Pizza Hut has a profile on MySpace devoted to a pizza-delivery
driver called Ted, who helpfully lets friends in on the chain's latest
promotional offers (―Dude, I just heard some scoop from the Hut, ran
one recent post). Wal-Mart started up and rapidly closed down a
much-derided teenage site called The Hub last year. Reuters hopes to do
better with its forthcoming site for those in the financial-services
industry. Social networking has proved to be of greatest value to
companies in recruitment. Unlike a simple jobs board, social networks
enable members to pass suitable vacancies on to people they know, and to
refer potential candidates back to the recruiter. So employers reach
not only active jobseekers but also a much larger pool of passive
candidates through referrals. LinkedIn has over 350 corporate customers
which pay up to $250,000 each to advertise jobs to its expanding
network. Having lots of people in a network increases its value in a
―super-linear fashion, says Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn's founder. He says
corporate use of his service is now spreading beyond recruiters: hedge
funds use it to identify and contact experts, for example. Jobster, a
Seattle-based social-networking site, is entirely devoted to
recruitment. Jobseekers can post their own profiles and tag their
skills; these tags are then used to match candidates against jobs posted
by employers. Unlike on LinkedIn, companies can set up private networks
to ensure that the right kinds of people are alerted to openings and
that the data they post remain under their control. Information needs to
stay behind when a user leaves the company, argues Jason Goldberg,
Jobster's founder. Where LinkedIn emphasises scale and Jobster
emphasises specialisation, Visible Path, a startup based in New York,
focuses on the strength of individual relationships. The firm analyses
email traffic, calendars and diary entries to identify the strongest
relationships that exist inside and outside a company. An obvious
application is to generate leads: a salesman can use the service to
identify who within his network has the closest links to a prospect, and
request an introduction. Such techniques are also gathering momentum in
―knowledge management . IBM recently unveiled a social-software
platform called Lotus Connections, due out in the next few weeks, that
lets company employees post detailed profiles of themselves, team up on
projects and share bookmarks. One manufacturer testing the software is
using it to put inexperienced members of its customer-services team in
touch with the right engineers. It can also be used to identify in-house
experts. Software firms will probably start bundling social features of
this kind into all sorts of business software. To work well in the
business world, social networking has to clear some big hurdles.
Incentives to participate in a network have to be symmetrical, for one
thing. The interests of MySpace members—and of jobseekers and
employers—may be aligned, but it is not clear why commission-hungry
salespeople would want to share their best leads with colleagues.
Limiting the size of the network can reduce its value for companies, yet
confidentiality is another obvious concern for companies that invite
outsiders into their online communities. ―Social networking sounds great
in theory, but the business benefits are still unproven, says Paul
Jackson of Forrester, a consultancy. But if who you know really does
matter more than what you know, it has obvious potential.
1. What is the author of the passage most likely to agree to?
Option 1 : Social networking has benefited corporate sector to a large extent.
Option 2 : Social networking is not useful for corporate sector.
Option 3 : Social networking may benefit the corporate sector to some extent.
Option 4 : None of these
2. According to the author, how does social networking help recruitment?
Option 1 : By increasing the reach in a super-linear fashion.
Option 2 : Making available a larger pool of passive candidates.
Option 3 : Since enthusiastic teenagers are also on the network.
Option 4 : None of these
3. Which of the following is an appropriate title for the passage?
Option 1 : Social Networking and Business
Option 2 : Social Networks Option 3 : Ethics of Social Networking in Business
Option 4 : Social Networking: Pros and Cons
4. Which of the following statements is Reid Hoffman most likely to agree to?
Option 1 : Social network is only useful for recruiting.
Option 2 : Social networking has other uses apart from recruiting.
Option 3 : Social networking has not impacted business much.
Option 4 : The prime use of social networking is for Hedge funds.
5. What meaning of avid could you infer from the passage?
Option 1 : Dormant Option 2 : Unprincipled Option 3 : Unwanted 4 : Enthusiastic
6. What is the most probable context in which the author is talking about Pizza Hut?
Option 1 : Social networking did not benefit it.
Option 2 : Social networking was a big success for it.
Option 3 : Social networking created problems for it. 4 : None of these
7. Why does the author call Lotus Connections a social software platform?
Option 1 : Because it is used for knowledge management.
Option 2 : It has a feature to allow employees to interact and cooperate with each other.
Option 3 : Because IBM developed it.
Option 4 : Because the service team can get in touch with the right engineers using it.
8. What are the hurdles that social networking has to overcome in order to benefit the business world?
Option 1 : Issue of confidentiality. Option 2 : Misalignment of interests.
Option 3 : Misalignment of interests and confidentiality. Option 4 : None of these
Deserves a heartš¤
ReplyDelete